The rebuttal for the closing arguments AEG made yesterday will be televised live today here: http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/livenow?id=9259817
Yesterday's closing argument made by Marvin Putnam was difficult to watch yesterday. I, as well as many other commentators that I watched with, shut it off midway. The offensive way Mr. Putnam tried to tell the jurors that they did not see the evidence they did see and could not use their own common sense to put the so obvious pieces of testimony together, appalled me. It reminded me of that song by Shaggy, "It Wasn't Me".
There is something about human nature that seems to be a common thread among thieves and liers. Not only is their sense of what's right and wrong completely off, but their sense of under minding the logic and intuition of others completely maddens me. Church lady might ask if we could say the word "manipulation".
And so that's the word for this whole ordeal, "manipulation" and "control". Abusive people, those that want to obtain power and money, use it like their best weapons. Luckily there are those that recognize these wolves in sheeps clothing. When they attempt to shout their innocence to the world, some will stand up and reiterate those things that the onlookers already know. Today is that day, as we await Mr Brian Panish, the attorney for Katherine Jackson. I am confident he will shatter any confusion and blurred lines that the AEG attorney tried to mask yesterday.
Mr Putnam spoke much about red flags, although he failed to mention that the biggest red flags were the EVIDENCE that was presented. Email after email, testimony after testimony, and the bottom line: who had control of Dr Murray? In AEG's own email, they did.
The video below reveals just how relevant the AEG argument was yesterday.
AND, we already know Conrad Murray wasn't really the one that was responsible for Michael's death anyway. But if it wasn't Conrad Murray, then who would benefit by making a deal like this with AEG? Church Lady might have the answer for that as well:
Yesterday's closing argument made by Marvin Putnam was difficult to watch yesterday. I, as well as many other commentators that I watched with, shut it off midway. The offensive way Mr. Putnam tried to tell the jurors that they did not see the evidence they did see and could not use their own common sense to put the so obvious pieces of testimony together, appalled me. It reminded me of that song by Shaggy, "It Wasn't Me".
There is something about human nature that seems to be a common thread among thieves and liers. Not only is their sense of what's right and wrong completely off, but their sense of under minding the logic and intuition of others completely maddens me. Church lady might ask if we could say the word "manipulation".
And so that's the word for this whole ordeal, "manipulation" and "control". Abusive people, those that want to obtain power and money, use it like their best weapons. Luckily there are those that recognize these wolves in sheeps clothing. When they attempt to shout their innocence to the world, some will stand up and reiterate those things that the onlookers already know. Today is that day, as we await Mr Brian Panish, the attorney for Katherine Jackson. I am confident he will shatter any confusion and blurred lines that the AEG attorney tried to mask yesterday.
Mr Putnam spoke much about red flags, although he failed to mention that the biggest red flags were the EVIDENCE that was presented. Email after email, testimony after testimony, and the bottom line: who had control of Dr Murray? In AEG's own email, they did.
The video below reveals just how relevant the AEG argument was yesterday.
AND, we already know Conrad Murray wasn't really the one that was responsible for Michael's death anyway. But if it wasn't Conrad Murray, then who would benefit by making a deal like this with AEG? Church Lady might have the answer for that as well:
No comments:
Post a Comment