3/3/15

Psychics in the Government, Ghosts and Testimony in the Courts


AlmostHuman_Hearsay
source: http://thelegalgeeks.com/blog/?tag=almosthuman

Several years ago I contacted medium Mark Anthony.  Mark is a medium, but also a lawyer.

I wanted to know if a psychic was ever allowed to enter testimony into a court of law.  As our beliefs in society have shifted, like our belief once that the world was flat, so are our perceptions of what is real.

In a poll done done by CBS in 2005, it was found that 48% of people believe in ghosts. A whopping 78% believe in life after death.

More than one in five Americans say they have seen a ghost themselves, or have felt themselves to be in the presence of one.

With the consciousness changing on the planet, more and more people, and scientists, are realizing as humans that we have more to who we are than mere bodies and our current beliefs.

If a witness is testifying as an expert at a trial, his testimony in the form of an opinion is limited to such an opinion as is:

(a) Related to a subject that is sufficiently beyond common experience that the opinion of an expert would assist the trier of fact; and

(b) Based on matter (including his special knowledge, skill, experience, training, and education) perceived by or personally known to the witness or made known to him at or before the hearing, whether or not admissible, that is of a type that reasonably may be relied upon by an expert in forming an opinion upon the subject to which his testimony relates, unless an expert is precluded by law from using such matter as a basis for his opinion.

On the face of the code section, an expert opinion cannot be twisted into a dead person testifying from a “psychic medium,” because such testimony is not actually an opinion, but “hearsay” from a dead person. Given the issues with cross-examination or whether the dead can make a statement, a Court would likely bar such testimony.


However in our present age, jurors at the AEG vs Katherine Jackson trial several years ago, DID hear such testimony from Randy Phillips of AEG:

"Jurors at the Jacko trial heard testimony from a surprise witness yesterday — the ghost of Michael Jackson!

Randy Phillips, CEO of concert promoter AEG Live, testified about a chat he had with his longtime friend Brenda Richie, who claimed to have talked to a medium who had channeled the spirit of The Gloved One after his 2009 death.

In the supernatural tête-á-tête, Jacko’s ghost allegedly absolved Dr. Conrad Murray of any guilt in his death and admitted he “accidentally killed himself,” Phillips said.

“Brenda called me to tell me that she was in communications with Michael either through a medium or directly,” Phillips told jurors about his talk with Richie, the ex-wife of singer Lionel Richie.

“She said Michael told her that it wasn’t Dr. Murray’s fault, that he had accidentally killed himself.”

Brian Panish, a lawyer for Michael Jackson’s family, objected to Phillips’ ghost story, calling it triple hearsay, since Phillips was relaying a chat from Richie, who had heard from a medium, who — allegedly — spoke to a dead Jacko.

Remarkably — over the laughter of courtroom spectators — LA County Superior Court Judge Yvette Palazuelos allowed Phillips’ explanation to stand."



When I read the above two items relating to testimony, I would think that a reasonable history of psychic communication prior to an incident, such as a death, would allowed to be entered into a court of law.  With testimony from Randy Phillips hearing third party information from only a medium, why wouldn't the testimony from a twin soul counterpart be allowed to be entered?

Physics and mediums do have their fair share of non believers.  But just for today I'd like to break this down.  A physic tunes into "possible" futures.  Some things seen may come to fruition, others may not.  The reasoning is simple.  People have free will.  If someone says you'll go into accounting for instance, that may be where you are headed, but at last minute you may decide to go into computers.

With mediums we have to take into account the methodology and verification process of whom the medium is speaking to.  Mediums are different because they aren't giving what may come information, but more transferring information from the departed, based on who and what they believe they are being given.

I'd like to step that up a notch to the twin flame realm.  Many people haven't heard of flames, but unlike a medium or psychic, they are documented in many ancient texts. According to the Talmud, in Sotah 2a, Rav Yehudah it is said that 40 days before a male child is formed, a voice from heaven announces whose daughter he is going to marry.  This is said to be literally a match made in heaven.

The Kabbalah (Jewish Mysticism) speaks of husband and wife as “plag nishmasa – half souls”. And Nachmanides explains in his Emunah U’Bitachon (Chapter 24) that G-d takes the soul whose time has come for it to enter into this world, and separates it into two halves, placing one half in the male and one half in the female. And when these two halves meet again in matrimony, their original connection and love bond comes back.

So how can a bond that has been documented be overlooked by a court of law when testimony from a third party psychic be allowed to be entered?  If we are looking at the facts, the history and the basis of a reasonably reliable witness, which testimony holds greater water?

In the case of twin souls, it's not even the ability to speak with the dead.  Scenes, feelings and visions are experienced through your own eyes, mind and emotions.  This isn't third party information, information being transmitted from the departed, it's information coming directly from the soul.

As we progress through these ages of disbelief in a phenomenon our current society is still learning about, I'd like you to take a look at the importance these types of phenomenon our federal government has placed on these so called extraordinary events.

Joseph McMoneagle worked with the CIA some years ago.  He received The Legion of Merit from the military for his remote viewing work. That award is only given for "exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding services and achievements". It ranks higher, for example, than the DFC.  Joseph was part of a federally funded program to use psychics in our own department of defense.

You can view the video below to see the testimony of his findings, along with the testimony of his counterparts on things that happened that they could not explain.  This evidence further contends that because our humanity cannot explain things that transpire, it doesn't mean it does not exist.  What is certain, however, is that mankind cannot explain our true spiritual identities currently simply because we don't have enough information.  How can you measure something you don't see?  How can you believe in something you haven't yourself experienced?  These are the questions that most people base their belief systems on.  However, again, I have to say, how many people believed that the world was flat?  Almost everyone back in the days prior to the actual discovery that the world was round.

Science and spirituality are now joining hands.  And as they do, I don't think I need to be psychic to say that our world of tomorrow will be based on much more non tangibles than it is today.  These psychic experiments were done years ago.  Not only by our country, but others as well.  Our governments are taking notice.  It may be time for the general public and courts to take notice as well.






Here are some other psychics and mediums relating to the case of Michael Jackson and their knowledge of the events:


Bonnie Vent on the conspiracy:





June Gatlin on Tohme:





Bonnie Vent: Willing to Testify:




Other psychics involved in crimes: Allison DuBois

Allison DuBois is one of the most recognized psychics in the world. She's so famous that they based a television show on her life—Patricia Arquette plays her on the television show Medium. Allison rose to prominence through her ability to see into the minds of murder victims and the people who allegedly committed crimes.

             



No comments: