Hypothesis: Michael Jackson was deliberately drugged by Conrad Murray, who under direct supervision of AEG, made sure that he would not be able to perform as necessary to meet the requirements of the contract. I further contend, that John Branca was directly involved with negotiating a deal with AEG in an attempt to regain the controlling rights over Sony and other assets , such as the Beatles catalog owned and acquired by Michael Jackson from Branca and Sony in previous years. Branca and his Sony company board participants facilitated rights to documented footage and sales of This Is It as well as stepping in to facilitate their own deal by ensuring all assets of Michael Jackson would be transferred to the Estate of Michael Jackson (John Branca and McClain) for their own control; this includes the self dealing company they are a part of: Sony. These self dealings continue today by the formation of trusts and other investments benefiting Sony and the executors directly.
The Questions:
What was on the contract with AEG and Michael? Collateral: In the event of default, AEG would be entitled to all assets of Michael Jackson freely - particularly outlining "including films", etc.
What did Sony wish to acquire from Michael? The assets once lost to Michael from Sony and Branca: The Beatles Catalog and ownership rights in Sony itself.
Was AEG in the business of films? AEG and Sony are named on the DVD version of This Is It. Their "agreement" allowed them to gain huge profits. I believe Randy Phillips of AEG realized how much "profit" he could acquire per his email to introduce the project to AEG when he noted how much money Sony made from Michael Jackson sales in January of that year. I have no prior knowledge of AEG being in the film business. AEG is known as a concert promoter, not a film producer.
How did AEG acquire footage of This Is It and so soon? The US Copyright office shows documented filing for copyright of This is It was acquired 5 business days after Michael's date of death by AEG. Was AEG filming for themselves, when prior testimony stated they were not? And if not, how did they acquire rights to this footage since the executors of the estate for Michael Jackson would be in charge of his assets at this point? If it is true then, they were filming, it shows intent to enter into an agreement with Sony from the beginning. If not, did the executors run to Michael's house get the footage then call AEG and say "Hey, let's make a movie?" all in a matter of hours?
What is different from Michael during the 8 week period talked about in the trial from him doing multiple spins to hardly able to do one? Conrad Murray's entering into a verbal agreement with AEG. On May 1st Conrad Murray's services began. He documents that his services were being fulfilled to the "client" in good faith in his email to Tim Wooley of AEG on 5/28/09. This would not only imply that Conrad was servicing AEG's "client", not Michael Jackson, but that according to testimony, the deteriorating health of Michael Jackson was as a direct result of this agreement with Conrad Murray and AEG to service the "client" proven by the period of eight weeks of deteriorating health as testified and the simultaneous chronology of the date services began for "the client".
On 5/28 another email from Murray to Tim Wooley of AEG states: "I find it a pleasure to work with you and look forward for future endeavors." What future endeavors? I thought they were contending he worked for Michael and in such case should have been corresponding with Michael about "future endeavors", not AEG.
What drugs were on the autopsy report and found in the home that would lead us to believe that someone was deliberately poisoning Michael? During a recent review of both the autopsy and coroners report we find many different drugs. The ones that stand out, however, are drugs that contradict each other. Propofol, Lidocane and Flumazemil, for instance were detected in a syringe and in fluid from IV tubing. Flumazemil is an agent that elicits symptoms of benzodiazepine withdrawl (which Michael exhibited with flu like symptoms, paranoia, forgetfullness, sensitivity to the ears, etc) and also is used as a blocking agent for properties found in other benzodiazepine. What does this mean? Not only was Michael being given Propofol to help him sleep, he was also being given an agent to keep him awake at the same time, further rendering other side effects including prolonged insomnia, flu like symptoms, etc. Further findings on the report include evidence of Ephedrine in the urine. This is a diet pill. Recent photos of Michael and his severe loss in weight (also a symptom from withdrawl effect) don't look like he needed an appetite suppressant. If I wanted to run someone down, however, I might use one or two and make sure they don't sleep as well. I would say that would have a definite effect on one spin versus multiple spins in just the months prior.
Why would they poison Michael? To acquire the assets, money from sales and still go on with the show. Looking at photos, clips and even songs to date lead me to question: Will the real Michael Jackson please stand up?
Who would benefit? AEG, Sony, The Michael Jackson Estate (i.e. John Branca and McClain)
How do we know AEG was involved? Recent testimony reveals even early on how lazy Randy Phillips explained Michael was and that he would try to get out of doing the shows. He goes on further to state how Michael will lose everything, they had a contract. Talk about coming out with it. Of course he would paint him lazy when he knows he's making him that way and getting everything for himself as a direct result of a breach of contract, is exactly what was intended.
Further, the evidence of emails regarding the insurance policy that was obtained early on included a healthy medical exam for Michael. In March they tried to up the insurance but when faced with getting an updated exam and the exam was requested to be in London they wanted to "pull the plug", then in later emails "reschedule" for sooner in the states. They already knew Michael wouldn't pass medical in London - they had plans to make sure he wouldn't be able to perform, let along pass a medical exam. If it was all on the up and up then Conrad Murray wouldn't have lied on behalf of AEG as evidenced on 6/23 that he was in great health. The documentation is an email from Kathy Jarrie of AEG thanking Murray for his "assistance" with the insurance company.
On June 18, 2009 Phillips and Gongaware of AEG demanded Michael stop seeing Dr. Arnold Klein and demanded medications only be taken by Murray. Klein may have been able to help and most likely would have gotten in the way since he had been Michael's doctor for years.
Phillips also resisted the request from Kenny Ortega to seek help for Michael when Kenny complained about Michael's state of mind. Not only did he say no psychological help as Kenny offered he needed, but said that it was "critical" that none of them in the show become amateur physicians or psychologists. This implies he not only knows something about Michael's physical state, but tells us further to leave it to Conrad Murray. He has it well handled, he says, and is, by the way, under AEG's direction.
Who was Frank Dileo and why did he come back into Michael's life? Michael's "former" manager and sat on the board of directors for Sony. He wasn't his manager in January when Michael started negotiating with AEG, apparently "someone" hired him back in. If we know AEG is the one footing the bill, my bet is on them.
Where was the security footage? Security footage from the home where Michael was living was missing the night he passed. No one knows where it went.
Who paid security? AEG paid everyone and for everything, retaining control of everything and everyone in Michael's life at that time.
Who paid Dr. Murray? The contract with Murray was with AEG. His revised contract even included a "confidentiality" agreement. The first did not. Revised contract date: 6/23 per email evidence entered into court. The confidentiality included the sensitive information Conrad Murray might come across. If he was Michael's doctor, I don't think the confidential things were AEG's business, yet I guess AEG remained in control, so this does make sense. We wouldn't want Conrad to tell anyone about what was "expected" of him.
Who scheduled additional shows? AEG
Who fired all of Michael's business associates in the same month Murray was hired? AEG
Why did the estate not take action against Conrad Murray if he was responsible for Michael's death? The estate has contended Murray has no money, however, the contact that he had with AEG required him to obtain malpractice insurance. I guess that would cover the good old doctor so what other reason would the estate have in not suing him? Obligation? They have already made it known to sue for less, like Michael's Heal the World Foundation but not Michael's death? That's odd, don't you think?
Why is AEG interested in seeing "an innocent man" set free? I would imagine the same reason the estate has not taken action against him. Conspiracy.
Whose name(s) are on the This is It DVD case? AEG, Sony, Columbia Pictures, The Michael Jackson Company (The Estate)
Who was taking footage of This is It? According to testimony in the Conrad Murray trial, no one but Michael's guys were. However, according to credits on the film as well as copyright application, we see many cameras and camera men being given credit.
How was that footage acquired? If it was Michael's it stands to reason someone took it from his home and I don't think he handed it to anyone.
