Why Justice has Eluded Michael Jackson Fans

A Bill for the State of California called SBX 211 was passed in February, 2009.  The bill states that judges and justices in the State of California are held in immunity for prosecution regarding accepting bribes and donations in their public office in excess of their salary.  In other words, they can accept money from anyone and not be held responsible for receiving it, nor can anyone take action against them for any criminal activity related to it's acceptance.

Reports show that approximately 90% of the judges received illegal payments from approximately thirty counties and courts as of 2008.   This particular bill was enacted on May 21, 2009.  Just days prior, on May 18, 2009, AEG sent it's infamous email (at least on this blog), that outlined their new budget.  As you may recall, this is the budget where they dropped all cancellation insurance and left only the life portion on (Lloyds of London vs AEG) AND budgeted Conrad Murray for ONLY TWO months - May and June. (see original AEG email here).  The budgeted amount for Murray would have only taken Murray through June; not for any length of any tour.  Michael Jackson died on June 25, 2009.

Is this just a coincidence or perhaps some pre-planning on the part of AEG?   This case was definitely pre-meditated murder.

Just in case you're still wondering, here is an excerpt from Family Security Matters regarding this exact bill:

"he describes the powerful legal and law enforcement organizations that went on record defending the double benefits for judges, such as LA District Attorney Steve Cooley, County Public Defender, all Bar Associations and big law firms who appear before the Judges."

Read more: Family Security Matters http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.3416/pub_detail.asp#ixzz3yyLTjkQp 

Under Creative Commons License: Attribution

As you may recall, Mr. Cooley was the District Attorney that signed the request by the Michael Jackson Estate (that would be a legal organization-attorney John Branca/Weitzman) for the concealment of the insurance policy AEG had in place with Michael Jackson's former manager, Tohme Tohme, added to it just three days prior to Michael's death.  This would be, as it states below, until Dr. Murray was convicted for the crime.

He was also the District Attorney that accepted "donations" from all parties involved in Michael Jackson's murder.

This law affects all the people in the State of California (except of course for it's corrupt politicians):

"As examples, cases and appeals in the substantive areas of law affected are: (1) administrative law cases; (2) child custody and family law cases; (3) class action cases; (4)  conservatorship and elder cases; (5) constitutional law cases; (6)  contract cases; (7) criminal cases; (8) death, estate, guardianship and probate cases; (9)  eminent domain cases; (10) environmental cases; (11) government abuse of power cases; (12) personal injury cases; (13)  property cases; (14) regulation cases; (15) tax cases; (16) traffic cases, and (17) zoning cases, amongst others."

Currently there are some attorneys and others banding together to reverse this bill.  In cases where illegal judgments and/or bribes have been accepted, Attorney Richard Fine states:

"Case law has long held that “…any act of a disqualified judge is absolutely void whenever brought into question. A judgment rendered by such a judge is open to attack at any time.” In re Henry C., 161 Cal.App.3d 646, 652 (1985) citing T.P.B. v. Superior Court, 66 Cal.App.3d 881, 886 (1977). In Rossco Holdings Inc. v. Bank of America, 149 Cal.App.4th 1353 (2007), 158 Cal.Rptr.3d 141, the court stated at page 148:

“Orders made by a disqualified judge are void. (Cadenasso v. Bank of Italy (1932),214 Cal. 562, 6 P.2d 944;Christie v. City of El Centro (2006),135 Cal.App.4th 767, 37 Cal.Rptr.3d 718.) There is a dispute in recent appellate authority as to whether such orders should be considered void or only voidable at the option of a party; the Supreme Court’s latest opinion on the matter held them to be void. (Christie v. City of El Centro, supra, 135 Cal.App.4th at pp. 769-780, 37 Cal.Rptr.3d 718.)….”[Disqualification occurs  when the facts creating disqualification arise, not when the disqualification is established.” (Christie v. City of El Centro, supra, 135 Cal.App.4th at p. 776, 37 Cal.Rptr.3d 718.) “[I]t is the fact of disqualification that controls, not subsequent judicial action on that disqualification.” (Id. at p. 777, 37 Cal. Rptr.3d 718.) (Emphasis added.)

In Vallely v. Northern Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 254 U.S. 348 (1920), the U.S. Supreme Court emphasized that no court could validate a void judgment at 254 U.S. at 353-354:
source:  http://scannedretina.com/2013/04/19/an-act-to-repeal-and-ammend-sections-of-sbx-211-letter-to-california-state-lawmakers/

This is why there has been such a fight for justice in the case of Michael Jackson's death.  Corruption is and has been on the rise.  Unfortunately, it's the common people who are paying the corrupt politicians through taxes and other forms, as they further their abuses on them for their own selfish means.

If you haven't taken an active part in looking at what's going on in your town, it may be time this year.  I hear there's a few elections coming up.

The Full SBX 211 Bill that passed in 2009: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx2_11_bill_20090220_chaptered.pdf