2/9/16

ASTRO NEWS-Dreams, Eclipses and Change!

Astro News
By Maria Shaw

The week looks good, especially for financial opportunity and meaningful connections.

If you are following my 2016 Moon Calendar, you will see that there's a lot of strong and lucky financial days this week and into the weekend. Make sure to write your Law of Abundance checks or manifest money under these lucky cosmic influences.

Are you getting signs from the Universe?
I want you to start watching for signs and symbols this week. With the spring eclipses around the corner, the Universe is ready to send us all a personal message about a change in our lives. We have two eclipses coming, a solar eclipse in Pisces and a Lunar eclipse in Libra in March. This month we should be getting a strong message as to what needs to change in our life or what opportunity awaits. Eclipses act as wild cards. They bring in needed change even if we can't appreciate it at the time.

For some folks, these eclipses could bring pressure on the job so they will feel inclined to look for new work. Sometimes, a new relationship develops under this influence. You just never know what to expect exactly but you can tell what area of life the change will occur in, if you follow astrology. For now, be very aware of the subtle and not so subtle messages you may be receive between now and the 22nd of February. I'll be doing an hour long class on the Internet on February 16.  I would recommend everyone print off a free copy of their chart at astro.com and you can follow along during the webinar class and understand how the eclipse will personally affect you.

Tuesday and Wednesday are high yield and lucky days. I would suggest you do something positive to move your intentions along these days. Make phone calls. Build strong connections. Reach out to people this week as astrological influences tend to fall in your favor now. If you are starting a new project, now is a good time to promote it or get it off the ground. If applying for a loan, to school, for a new job or business license, these things tend to go extremely well this week.

Tuesday night and Wednesday be sure to listen to your dreams. You may have more dreams than usual and these could have a strong hidden meaning of some sort. Even bad dreams can bring a good omen. But be mindful of what your subconscious is trying to express this week as there are important messages coming through. Some of you may be dreaming of deceased loved ones during this period too. This is one way they can connect energetically with you and spend time with you. Positive energy is available  in so many ways, to all those who make a point to access it this week.

Thursday and Friday you may take the initiative to start a new project. You my have a sudden insight or a psychic thought that pops in your head. These could be messages from your angels and spirit guides to do something. Run with it! You are being divinely guided and if ideas pop into your head out of the blue, know that you are being pushed and inspired to try something new!

For more information on Maria visit her website at www.mariashaw.com
Registration for the online class being held on the 16th is also on the site:

The Eclipses are Coming and Crystal Connections
Tuesday February 16th - 8p.m. eastern / 7p.m. Central

2/8/16

The Michael Jackson Estate and the INVALID Will



"Under California Probate Code 6110, a written will is valid if the maker signs the document or affirms her signature in the presence of two witnesses, who also sign the will. Witnesses should be disinterested. If one of the witnesses stands to inherit under the will, the law presumes that he used undue influence and the burden is on the witness to prove otherwise."
source: http://info.legalzoom.com/californias-statutory-requirements-last-testament-4189.html


In a recent review of documents, I noticed three witness signatures on the Will of Michael Jackson; Trudy Green, John McClain and Barry Seigel.  The will in question was apparently signed on July 7, 2002 at 5:00 pm, in Los Angeles CA:



Under California law, as stated above, the witnesses on the will should be "disinterested parties". Both Barry Siegel and John McClain were not "disinterested parties" - they were apparently named as executors of the will and both on the board for Sony corporation; a controlling interested party in the catalog Michael Jackson owned called Sony/ATV.  Further, John McClain is now collecting on proceeds from the sales of music titles along with the other executor of the Michael Jackson Estate, John Branca and both are taking a salary for managing what they're taking from the Estate.

Barry Siegel signed a document on August 26, 2003 declining to be named as a co-trustee of the Michael Jackson Family Trust and as a co-executor of the last will of Michael Joseph Jackson. However, even looking at the signatures on the two documents it seems even Barry's signature is different on the two documents.  This leaves one signature by Trudy Green, not two, making this will invalid according to California Probate Code 6110, For the record Barry Siegel is and was a CPA managing money for Michael Jackson at one time. His firm "Provident Financial Management" would stand to gain should he have remained on the will in question as well. He was "managing" funds for the "This is It" tour and was involved in the accounting for the Estate as evidenced in the AEG vs Katherine Jackson court records.

Here is the letter from Barry Siegel declining his co-executor ship of the last will of Michael Joseph Jackson: Note the signatures.






This letter addressed to Michael's CPA at the time, Jeff Cannon, on March 25, 2009, came just after Michael's letter to Randy Phillips of AEG that Tohme Tohme was no longer his representative. Here the letter is apparently asking on this same day to "transfer" ALL records to none other than Barry Siegel:


John Branca's firm drafted the will and states that it was signed in Los Angeles CA on the 7th of July. The other problem is that Michael Jackson was in New York City that day and from the looks of what he was speaking about I don't think he was interested in doing business with Sony or Branca any longer.  As of February, 2003 Branca was terminated http://www.thewrap.com/media/article/secret-report-got-branca-fired-22850/

Here's the evidence related to Michael Jackson's where a bouts on July 7, 2002:





Finally, in assessing whether the will had testamentary intent, did the court even ask when Michael Jackson signed the will if the witnessing signatures were in his presence?  Were they ALL indeed in Los Angeles or were they ALL in New York City? And, if they ALL were in New York, why does the will state Los Angeles?  And if ALL of them were in Los Angeles, then obviously the signatures were not witnessed in the presence of Michael Jackson and therefore the will is still INVALID.


2/7/16

Stepping Out of the Drama

Some people play by the rules, and others draw their lives out of the lines.

A criminal will play on the odds of not being caught.  Like a gambler, they gamble at the chances someone may do something, say something, or bring the crime to anyone's attention.

If they've drawn enough attention to themselves, they'll believe they hold the upper hand.  They'll go out of their way to make people believe their the good guy, doing right and being honest and respectable.

But those of us that know better we see through the deception and the web of illusion.  In ascension, you learn how to "discern" the true intent of any given soul.

In the world we live in today, they're not many that would believe that spiritual receptiveness or god like qualities even exist.  We have been so focused on the external world, we find it hard to believe anything but our own thoughts exist within us.  I beg to differ.

Our connections are vast and in any given instance someone can catch a thought, view a glimpse or hear a word or phrase said about them or someone else.  No ear is closed in the world of spiritual truth.  We have two ears and one mouth for a reason.  And for those of us that listen more than we talk, we'll find that we'll always hold the cards of the truth.

Truth isn't popular.  It's not egotistical, it's not rampant, and it's not closed minded.  Ego on the other hand, is critical; it's deceptive and it is argumentative.

When people stand in their truth, they stand silently, knowing that what they hold is true and powerful.  When truth comes it comes in the force of a vibration that rivets the fabric of our very creation.  There is no stopping truth.  It's not one's ego that enforces truth; it's the universe itself.  All negative energy seeks resolution through situations and people.  And there will always be people and situations to offer their assistance in resolving that energy.

When faced with negative situations and people, it's best to know ourselves and to know who is trying to engage us in the dance of deception.

Most humans live in a state of consciousness that likes to engage in drama.  A book entitled "The Celestine Prophecy" written some years back, gives the example of humans trying to "draw in" the victim by enticing them into a dramatic conflict.  An insult, a lie, an argumentative tone will all set the bait for an unconscious person to start the dance.  Once "hooked", the dance ensues and the baiter gets exactly what they want; more drama and the energy of the other person.

But who baits, who engages in these unconscious patterns and how do we recognize them?  There are key signs to look for:


  • A person who insults you directly.
  • A person who insults you while trying to be polite.
  • Someone who doesn't know you, but is making assumptions and statements about you.
  • Someone seeking to control you.
  • Someone eager to ruin your reputation.
  • Someone wanting to isolate you by talking to other people about you.
  • Someone who wants to divert your attention, because they want you to "not" look at something else.
  • Someone trying to manipulate you into doing what they want you to do because they'll derive some form of benefit.
All of these situations are on both a personal everyday level and on a grander public level.  Many people will try to ruin the reputation of a rising star because it may suit their purposes. While a jealous co-worker may try to sabotage your work, because he or she will want to "appear" better. Most often our "ego" engages.  We'll choose to fight back, to gossip back, to talk about that other person as well.  Yet when we refuse to engage any unconscious pattern thrown at us, we then take the power away from the baiter and leave it to reside in ourselves.


As Jesus said, know yourself .  Know how you will react to any given situation.  When someone tells something untrue about you, how will you feel, what will you do? If you let the untrue statements "in" and they become your own thoughts, then you have allowed the "outside" world effect your "internal" one.  If you engage in the pattern of the ego to "be right" for the sake of being right, where exactly does it take you in the end?

There will always be unconscious people ready to offer you a chance to engage with their ego.  They will challenge you, place bets upon what you will or won't do, and they'll say mean and nasty things about you - all because they have but one purpose in mind - it makes THEM feel better about themselves.  Whether it's hiding a deed they did, making up for lies they told, or to hide jealousy and envy, it all comes down to the ego.  If you dare to "edge God out" (EGO) of the equation, you'll repeatedly and unconsciously, repeat the pattern of negative energy in your life.

But for those of us that wish to rid ourselves of this negative energy and step out of the drama others seem so willing to engage us in, we might find it useful to listen to a story by Eckhart Tolle.  A monk in a small village was once accused of fathering a child of a young teen.  It ruined his reputation, isolated him from people and it was all a lie:


How controlling energy looks and how a "conscious" person responds: (Celestine Prophecy)







2/4/16

The FEDERAL GOVERNMENT is After the ESTATE of Michael Jackson!

This photo was just released.  It looks like the Estate of Michael Jackson, John Branca and John McClain, are being brought to court by the United States Government:



As for the internet and people like Susan Elsa, the Estate of Michael Jackson has paid a company that gets bad publicity off the internet over thirty thousand dollars in just one year!  Don't think they wouldn't pay someone to open up a myriad of sites and put my name all over posts labeling me a fraud and lying about Michael's death.  If they would pay a company to remove their dirty laundry, you'd better believe they'd put a fake twin soul out there.  They already tried with a fake MJ.  http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2013/04/22/rumored-use-michael-jackson-body-doubles-could-be-key-issue-in-trial/

You'll see the document below which is an accounting of the Estate records.  Web Sheriff is a company that monitors and removes bad publicity on the net.




Michael Jackson Murder Conspiracy with Evidence - MUST SEE!

The Heat is On!

Things are getting heated!  The Michael Jackson Estate is currently being challenged in court. Although the press is obviously not publicizing the trial like they did for Conrad Murray, there is more authentic incriminating evidence coming out now.

A twitter user named "Twiggy" has been updating us from the courtroom.  Documents and statements from Michael Jackson's former business associate, Raymone Bain, have been posted to her account revealing the details of what transpired after the death of Michael Jackson.  Ms Bain signed the document in Washington DC and it was presented in the courtroom.  In it she states that she sent thousands of dollars to Mr. John Branca of the Michael Jackson Estate that he claimed he had no recollection of.  She also claimed part ownership to one of Michael's companies of which prior documents were shown to confer prior to the forming of the LLC in place at the time of Michael's death.  She stated that John Branca asked her to appear on television with him to endorse him as the official representative for the Michael Jackson Estate soon after he passed.

Apparently Mr. Branca began acting very nervous when questioned about the money and it was overheard outside the courtroom that Mr. Weitzman, John Branca's attorney, stated he needed to "get him out of here."

Photos were also posted of Tohme Tohme's home.  It is now shrouded with black tarp draped across it's entry gates.

Court documents also reveal that John Branca has filed for and has been granted a protection order.

"Twiggy" posted the following documents to her blog.  Special letters of administration describing the urgency to act immediately following Michael's death due to "third parties".

Here's a link to her look back:


WHAT HAPPENED TO MICHAEL?: FLASHBACK: JUNE 29, 2009 "LETTERS OF SPECIAL ADMIN...:                                                                                Londell McMillian and Burt Levitch June 29,2009   FILED:...



2/1/16

Why Justice has Eluded Michael Jackson Fans

A Bill for the State of California called SBX 211 was passed in February, 2009.  The bill states that judges and justices in the State of California are held in immunity for prosecution regarding accepting bribes and donations in their public office in excess of their salary.  In other words, they can accept money from anyone and not be held responsible for receiving it, nor can anyone take action against them for any criminal activity related to it's acceptance.

Reports show that approximately 90% of the judges received illegal payments from approximately thirty counties and courts as of 2008.   This particular bill was enacted on May 21, 2009.  Just days prior, on May 18, 2009, AEG sent it's infamous email (at least on this blog), that outlined their new budget.  As you may recall, this is the budget where they dropped all cancellation insurance and left only the life portion on (Lloyds of London vs AEG) AND budgeted Conrad Murray for ONLY TWO months - May and June. (see original AEG email here).  The budgeted amount for Murray would have only taken Murray through June; not for any length of any tour.  Michael Jackson died on June 25, 2009.

Is this just a coincidence or perhaps some pre-planning on the part of AEG?   This case was definitely pre-meditated murder.

Just in case you're still wondering, here is an excerpt from Family Security Matters regarding this exact bill:

"he describes the powerful legal and law enforcement organizations that went on record defending the double benefits for judges, such as LA District Attorney Steve Cooley, County Public Defender, all Bar Associations and big law firms who appear before the Judges."

Under Creative Commons License: Attribution

As you may recall, Mr. Cooley was the District Attorney that signed the request by the Michael Jackson Estate (that would be a legal organization-attorney John Branca/Weitzman) for the concealment of the insurance policy AEG had in place with Michael Jackson's former manager, Tohme Tohme, added to it just three days prior to Michael's death.  This would be, as it states below, until Dr. Murray was convicted for the crime.



He was also the District Attorney that accepted "donations" from all parties involved in Michael Jackson's murder.









This law affects all the people in the State of California (except of course for it's corrupt politicians):

"As examples, cases and appeals in the substantive areas of law affected are: (1) administrative law cases; (2) child custody and family law cases; (3) class action cases; (4)  conservatorship and elder cases; (5) constitutional law cases; (6)  contract cases; (7) criminal cases; (8) death, estate, guardianship and probate cases; (9)  eminent domain cases; (10) environmental cases; (11) government abuse of power cases; (12) personal injury cases; (13)  property cases; (14) regulation cases; (15) tax cases; (16) traffic cases, and (17) zoning cases, amongst others."

Currently there are some attorneys and others banding together to reverse this bill.  In cases where illegal judgments and/or bribes have been accepted, Attorney Richard Fine states:


"Case law has long held that “…any act of a disqualified judge is absolutely void whenever brought into question. A judgment rendered by such a judge is open to attack at any time.” In re Henry C., 161 Cal.App.3d 646, 652 (1985) citing T.P.B. v. Superior Court, 66 Cal.App.3d 881, 886 (1977). In Rossco Holdings Inc. v. Bank of America, 149 Cal.App.4th 1353 (2007), 158 Cal.Rptr.3d 141, the court stated at page 148:

“Orders made by a disqualified judge are void. (Cadenasso v. Bank of Italy (1932),214 Cal. 562, 6 P.2d 944;Christie v. City of El Centro (2006),135 Cal.App.4th 767, 37 Cal.Rptr.3d 718.) There is a dispute in recent appellate authority as to whether such orders should be considered void or only voidable at the option of a party; the Supreme Court’s latest opinion on the matter held them to be void. (Christie v. City of El Centro, supra, 135 Cal.App.4th at pp. 769-780, 37 Cal.Rptr.3d 718.)….”[Disqualification occurs  when the facts creating disqualification arise, not when the disqualification is established.” (Christie v. City of El Centro, supra, 135 Cal.App.4th at p. 776, 37 Cal.Rptr.3d 718.) “[I]t is the fact of disqualification that controls, not subsequent judicial action on that disqualification.” (Id. at p. 777, 37 Cal. Rptr.3d 718.) (Emphasis added.)

In Vallely v. Northern Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 254 U.S. 348 (1920), the U.S. Supreme Court emphasized that no court could validate a void judgment at 254 U.S. at 353-354:
source:  http://scannedretina.com/2013/04/19/an-act-to-repeal-and-ammend-sections-of-sbx-211-letter-to-california-state-lawmakers/

This is why there has been such a fight for justice in the case of Michael Jackson's death.  Corruption is and has been on the rise.  Unfortunately, it's the common people who are paying the corrupt politicians through taxes and other forms, as they further their abuses on them for their own selfish means.

If you haven't taken an active part in looking at what's going on in your town, it may be time this year.  I hear there's a few elections coming up.

The Full SBX 211 Bill that passed in 2009: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx2_11_bill_20090220_chaptered.pdf